C&C 101 vs C&C SR 21
How do the C&C 101 and C&C SR 21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C SR 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 21.1 ft6.43 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 1,380 lb626 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 439 lb199 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 204 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 26.33 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 7.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.7 |
C&C 101 vs C&C SR 21: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 21.1 ft6.43 m for the C&C SR 21.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 487% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 21 carries the more powerful rig (26.3 vs 24.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 101 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.87).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.