C&C 101 vs C&C SR 25
How do the C&C 101 and C&C SR 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C SR 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 1,860 lb844 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 2,074 ft²192.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 219.41 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.1 |
C&C 101 vs C&C SR 25: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the C&C SR 25.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 335% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 25 carries the more powerful rig (219.4 vs 24.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 101 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.