C&C 101 vs C&C SR 27
How do the C&C 101 and C&C SR 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C SR 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.2 ft1.59 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | 121 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.6 |
C&C 101 vs C&C SR 27: the short version
- The C&C 101 is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 27.5 ft8.38 m for the C&C SR 27.
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 116% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 101 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.