C&C 101 vs C&C SR 33
How do the C&C 101 and C&C SR 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | C&C SR 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 33.1 ft10.08 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 5,372 lb2,437 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 541 ft²50.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 28.22 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 112 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.1 |
C&C 101 vs C&C SR 33: the short version
- The C&C 101 and C&C SR 33 are close in length (32.8 ft10.00 m vs 33.1 ft10.08 m ).
- The C&C 101 is heavier, displacing about 51% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 33 carries the more powerful rig (28.2 vs 24.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 101 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.