C&C 101 vs Landfall 43
How do the C&C 101 and Landfall 43 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 101 | C&C 101 | Landfall 43 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 42.1 ft12.83 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 34.4 ft10.49 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.34 m | 12.6 ft3.85 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 8,100 lb3,674 kg | 24,600 lb11,158 kg |
| Ballast | 3,351 lb1,520 kg | 9,075 lb4,116 kg |
| Sail area | 613 ft²56.9 m² | 771 ft²71.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.32 | 14.58 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 269 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 35.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.9 |
C&C 101 vs Landfall 43: the short version
- The Landfall 43 is the larger boat at 42.1 ft12.83 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.00 m for the C&C 101.
- The Landfall 43 is heavier, displacing about 204% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 101 carries the more powerful rig (24.3 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Landfall 43 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.