C&C 110 vs C&C 115
How do the C&C 110 and C&C 115 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 
C&C 115 | C&C 110 | C&C 115 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 37.8 ft11.51 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 11.9 ft3.63 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 11,800 lb5,352 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | 781 ft²72.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | 24.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 147 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 19.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.09 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.7 |
C&C 110 vs C&C 115: the short version
- The C&C 115 is the larger boat at 37.8 ft11.51 m LOA versus 36.3 ft11.07 m for the C&C 110.
- The C&C 115 is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 23.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 115 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 115 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.