C&C 110 vs C&C 36R
How do the C&C 110 and C&C 36R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 | C&C 110 | C&C 36R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 35.1 ft10.69 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 12,700 lb5,761 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 6,030 lb2,735 kg |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | 18.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.4 |
C&C 110 vs C&C 36R: the short version
- The C&C 110 is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.07 m LOA versus 35.1 ft10.69 m for the C&C 36R.
- The C&C 36R is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 110 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 36R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36R rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.