C&C 110 vs C&C 41
How do the C&C 110 and C&C 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 | C&C 110 | C&C 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 40.8 ft12.42 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 33.3 ft10.16 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 17,500 lb7,938 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | 812 ft²75.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | 19.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 25.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.7 |
C&C 110 vs C&C 41: the short version
- The C&C 41 is the larger boat at 40.8 ft12.42 m LOA versus 36.3 ft11.07 m for the C&C 110.
- The C&C 41 is heavier, displacing about 61% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 110 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 19.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 41 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.