C&C 110 vs C&C SR 25
How do the C&C 110 and C&C SR 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 | C&C 110 | C&C SR 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 1,860 lb844 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | 2,074 ft²192.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | 219.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 6.1 |
C&C 110 vs C&C SR 25: the short version
- The C&C 110 is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.07 m LOA versus 25.5 ft7.77 m for the C&C SR 25.
- The C&C 110 is heavier, displacing about 486% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 25 carries the more powerful rig (219.4 vs 23.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 110 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 110 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.