C&C 110 vs C&C SR 27
How do the C&C 110 and C&C SR 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 | C&C 110 | C&C SR 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.2 ft1.59 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 121 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 11.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.45 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 6.6 |
C&C 110 vs C&C SR 27: the short version
- The C&C 110 is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.07 m LOA versus 27.5 ft8.38 m for the C&C SR 27.
- The C&C 110 is heavier, displacing about 191% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The C&C 110 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 110 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.