C&C 110 vs Dockrell 37
How do the C&C 110 and Dockrell 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 110 | C&C 110 | Dockrell 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.07 m | 36.5 ft11.13 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.60 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 16,000 lb7,257 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 706 ft²65.6 m² | 492 ft²45.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.98 | 12.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 156 | 265 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 35.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.3 |
C&C 110 vs Dockrell 37: the short version
- The C&C 110 and Dockrell 37 are close in length (36.3 ft11.07 m vs 36.5 ft11.13 m ).
- The Dockrell 37 is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 110 carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dockrell 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dockrell 37 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.