C&C 115 vs C&C 26
How do the C&C 115 and C&C 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 115 
C&C 26 | C&C 115 | C&C 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.8 ft11.51 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 10.4 ft3.18 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 11,800 lb5,352 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 2,040 lb925 kg |
| Sail area | 781 ft²72.6 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.11 | 17.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 184 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 6.5 |
C&C 115 vs C&C 26: the short version
- The C&C 115 is the larger boat at 37.8 ft11.51 m LOA versus 25.6 ft7.80 m for the C&C 26.
- The C&C 115 is heavier, displacing about 119% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 115 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 115 rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.