C&C 115 vs C&C 33
How do the C&C 115 and C&C 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 115 
C&C 33 | C&C 115 | C&C 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.8 ft11.51 m | 32.9 ft10.02 m |
| Waterline length | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 26.4 ft8.05 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 11,800 lb5,352 kg | 9,800 lb4,445 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 4,075 lb1,848 kg |
| Sail area | 781 ft²72.6 m² | 501 ft²46.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.11 | 17.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 237 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 6.9 |
C&C 115 vs C&C 33: the short version
- The C&C 115 is the larger boat at 37.8 ft11.51 m LOA versus 32.9 ft10.02 m for the C&C 33.
- The C&C 115 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 33 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.