C&C 115 vs C&C 57
How do the C&C 115 and C&C 57 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 115 
C&C 57 | C&C 115 | C&C 57 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.8 ft11.51 m | 57.0 ft17.37 m |
| Waterline length | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 43.0 ft13.11 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 6.2 ft1.88 m |
| Displacement | 11,800 lb5,352 kg | 45,700 lb20,729 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 17,700 lb8,029 kg |
| Sail area | 781 ft²72.6 m² | 1,313 ft²122.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.11 | 16.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 257 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 38.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 8.8 |
C&C 115 vs C&C 57: the short version
- The C&C 57 is the larger boat at 57.0 ft17.37 m LOA versus 37.8 ft11.51 m for the C&C 115.
- The C&C 57 is heavier, displacing about 287% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 57 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 57 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.