C&C 115 vs C&C Landfall 39
How do the C&C 115 and C&C Landfall 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 115 
C&C Landfall 39 | C&C 115 | C&C Landfall 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.8 ft11.51 m | 38.8 ft11.81 m |
| Waterline length | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 12.2 ft3.73 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 11,800 lb5,352 kg | 19,497 lb8,844 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 6,248 lb2,834 kg |
| Sail area | 781 ft²72.6 m² | 667 ft²62.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.11 | 14.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 292 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 32.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.82 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 7.5 |
C&C 115 vs C&C Landfall 39: the short version
- The C&C Landfall 39 is the larger boat at 38.8 ft11.81 m LOA versus 37.8 ft11.51 m for the C&C 115.
- The C&C Landfall 39 is heavier, displacing about 65% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C Landfall 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Landfall 39 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.