C&C 115 vs Landfall 43
How do the C&C 115 and Landfall 43 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 115 
Landfall 43 | C&C 115 | Landfall 43 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.8 ft11.51 m | 42.1 ft12.83 m |
| Waterline length | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 34.4 ft10.49 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 12.6 ft3.85 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 11,800 lb5,352 kg | 24,600 lb11,158 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 9,075 lb4,116 kg |
| Sail area | 781 ft²72.6 m² | 771 ft²71.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.11 | 14.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 269 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 35.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 7.9 |
C&C 115 vs Landfall 43: the short version
- The Landfall 43 is the larger boat at 42.1 ft12.83 m LOA versus 37.8 ft11.51 m for the C&C 115.
- The Landfall 43 is heavier, displacing about 108% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Landfall 43 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Landfall 43 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.