C&C 115 vs Santana 37
How do the C&C 115 and Santana 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 115 
Santana 37 | C&C 115 | Santana 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.8 ft11.51 m | 37.7 ft11.48 m |
| Waterline length | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.63 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 11,800 lb5,352 kg | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Sail area | 781 ft²72.6 m² | 678 ft²63.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.11 | 17.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 248 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 27.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 7.3 |
C&C 115 vs Santana 37: the short version
- The C&C 115 and Santana 37 are close in length (37.8 ft11.51 m vs 37.7 ft11.48 m ).
- The Santana 37 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 115 carries the more powerful rig (24.1 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 37 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.