C&C 121 vs C&C 36R
How do the C&C 121 and C&C 36R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 121 | C&C 121 | C&C 36R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.0 ft12.19 m | 35.1 ft10.69 m |
| Waterline length | 35.5 ft10.82 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft3.99 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 14,600 lb6,622 kg | 12,700 lb5,761 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 6,030 lb2,735 kg |
| Sail area | 844 ft²78.4 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.61 | 18.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 146 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.4 |
C&C 121 vs C&C 36R: the short version
- The C&C 121 is the larger boat at 40.0 ft12.19 m LOA versus 35.1 ft10.69 m for the C&C 36R.
- The C&C 121 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 121 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 36R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36R rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.