C&C 121 vs C&C 38
How do the C&C 121 and C&C 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 121 
C&C 38 | C&C 121 | C&C 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.0 ft12.19 m | 37.6 ft11.45 m |
| Waterline length | 35.5 ft10.82 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft3.99 m | 12.2 ft3.71 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.4 ft1.96 m |
| Displacement | 14,600 lb6,622 kg | 14,700 lb6,668 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 844 ft²78.4 m² | 674 ft²62.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.61 | 17.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 146 | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.3 |
C&C 121 vs C&C 38: the short version
- The C&C 121 is the larger boat at 40.0 ft12.19 m LOA versus 37.6 ft11.45 m for the C&C 38.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 121 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 38 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.