C&C 121 vs C&C SR 33
How do the C&C 121 and C&C SR 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 121 | C&C 121 | C&C SR 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.0 ft12.19 m | 33.1 ft10.08 m |
| Waterline length | 35.5 ft10.82 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft3.99 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Displacement | 14,600 lb6,622 kg | 5,372 lb2,437 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 844 ft²78.4 m² | 541 ft²50.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.61 | 28.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 146 | 112 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.1 |
C&C 121 vs C&C SR 33: the short version
- The C&C 121 is the larger boat at 40.0 ft12.19 m LOA versus 33.1 ft10.08 m for the C&C SR 33.
- The C&C 121 is heavier, displacing about 172% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 33 carries the more powerful rig (28.2 vs 22.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 121 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 121 rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.