C&C 121 vs Wilderness 40
How do the C&C 121 and Wilderness 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 121 | C&C 121 | Wilderness 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.0 ft12.19 m | 40.0 ft12.19 m |
| Waterline length | 35.5 ft10.82 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 13.1 ft3.99 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 14,600 lb6,622 kg | 9,000 lb4,082 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 3,969 lb1,800 kg |
| Sail area | 844 ft²78.4 m² | 597 ft²55.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.61 | 22.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 146 | 123 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.9 | 14.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.6 |
C&C 121 vs Wilderness 40: the short version
- The C&C 121 and Wilderness 40 are close in length (40.0 ft12.19 m vs 40.0 ft12.19 m ).
- The C&C 121 is heavier, displacing about 62% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 121 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 22.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 121 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 121 rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.