C&C 131 vs C&C 26 Wave
How do the C&C 131 and C&C 26 Wave compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 131 | C&C 131 | C&C 26 Wave | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.10 m | 26.7 ft8.13 m |
| Waterline length | 37.2 ft11.35 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.95 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 8.7 ft2.65 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 16,975 lb7,700 kg | 4,700 lb2,132 kg |
| Ballast | 6,790 lb3,080 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Sail area | 889 ft²82.6 m² | 292 ft²27.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.54 | 16.65 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 172 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 15.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 6.4 |
C&C 131 vs C&C 26 Wave: the short version
- The C&C 131 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.10 m LOA versus 26.7 ft8.13 m for the C&C 26 Wave.
- The C&C 131 is heavier, displacing about 261% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 131 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 131 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 131 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.