C&C 131 vs C&C 27 Mk V
How do the C&C 131 and C&C 27 Mk V compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 131 
C&C 27 Mk V | C&C 131 | C&C 27 Mk V | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.10 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Waterline length | 37.2 ft11.35 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.95 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 8.7 ft2.65 m | 4.8 ft1.46 m |
| Displacement | 16,975 lb7,700 kg | 4,420 lb2,005 kg |
| Ballast | 6,790 lb3,080 kg | 1,715 lb778 kg |
| Sail area | 889 ft²82.6 m² | 343 ft²31.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.54 | 20.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 162 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 6.4 |
C&C 131 vs C&C 27 Mk V: the short version
- The C&C 131 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.10 m LOA versus 26.5 ft8.08 m for the C&C 27 Mk V.
- The C&C 131 is heavier, displacing about 284% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 131 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 131 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 131 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.