C&C 131 vs C&C 36-1
How do the C&C 131 and C&C 36-1 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 131 | C&C 131 | C&C 36-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.10 m | 35.7 ft10.87 m |
| Waterline length | 37.2 ft11.35 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.95 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 8.7 ft2.65 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 16,975 lb7,700 kg | 12,000 lb5,443 kg |
| Ballast | 6,790 lb3,080 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 889 ft²82.6 m² | 599 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.54 | 18.28 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 7.1 |
C&C 131 vs C&C 36-1: the short version
- The C&C 131 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.10 m LOA versus 35.7 ft10.87 m for the C&C 36-1.
- The C&C 131 is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 131 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 36-1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36-1 rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.