C&C 131 vs New York 30
How do the C&C 131 and New York 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 131 
New York 30 | C&C 131 | New York 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.10 m | 43.0 ft13.11 m |
| Waterline length | 37.2 ft11.35 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.95 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 8.7 ft2.65 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 16,975 lb7,700 kg | 17,782 lb8,066 kg |
| Ballast | 6,790 lb3,080 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Sail area | 889 ft²82.6 m² | 1,057 ft²98.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.54 | 24.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 147 | 294 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 50.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.23 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.2 | 7.3 |
C&C 131 vs New York 30: the short version
- The C&C 131 and New York 30 are close in length (43.0 ft13.10 m vs 43.0 ft13.11 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the New York 30 carries the more powerful rig (24.8 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The New York 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the New York 30 rates better for offshore work (1.23 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.