C&C 24 vs Islander 24
How do the C&C 24 and Islander 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 24 
Islander 24 | C&C 24 | Islander 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.4 ft1.04 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Ballast | 1,050 lb476 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 252 ft²23.4 m² | 269 ft²25.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.57 | 16.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.2 | 19.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
C&C 24 vs Islander 24: the short version
- The C&C 24 and Islander 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Islander 24 is heavier, displacing about 31% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Islander 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Islander 24 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.