C&C 24 vs Shark 24
How do the C&C 24 and Shark 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 24 
Shark 24 | C&C 24 | Shark 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.31 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 1,050 lb476 kg | 675 lb306 kg |
| Sail area | 252 ft²23.4 m² | 190 ft²17.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.57 | 18.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.2 | 11.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,980 |
C&C 24 vs Shark 24: the short version
- The C&C 24 and Shark 24 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.31 m ).
- The C&C 24 is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Shark 24 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.