C&C 26 vs Facil 26
How do the C&C 26 and Facil 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 26 
Facil 26 | C&C 26 | Facil 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.81 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.19 m | 20.1 ft6.13 m |
| Beam | 10.4 ft3.18 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 5,400 lb2,449 kg | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Ballast | 2,040 lb925 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 331 ft²30.8 m² | 366 ft²34.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.21 | 21.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 184 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.2 | 17.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €5,000 |
C&C 26 vs Facil 26: the short version
- The C&C 26 and Facil 26 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.81 m ).
- The C&C 26 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Facil 26 carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Facil 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Facil 26 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.