C&C 26 Wave vs Stiletto 27
How do the C&C 26 Wave and Stiletto 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 26 Wave | C&C 26 Wave | Stiletto 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.7 ft8.13 m | 26.8 ft8.18 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 13.8 ft4.22 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Ballast | 1,700 lb771 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 292 ft²27.1 m² | 336 ft²31.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.65 | 50.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 36 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.6 | 2.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 5.36 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.6 |
C&C 26 Wave vs Stiletto 27: the short version
- The C&C 26 Wave and Stiletto 27 are close in length (26.7 ft8.13 m vs 26.8 ft8.18 m ).
- The C&C 26 Wave is heavier, displacing about 327% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Stiletto 27 carries the more powerful rig (50.5 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 26 Wave scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 26 Wave rates better for offshore work (2.21 vs 5.36).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.