C&C 27 Mk V vs Island Packet 27
How do the C&C 27 Mk V and Island Packet 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 27 Mk V 
Island Packet 27 | C&C 27 Mk V | Island Packet 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 3.7 ft1.13 m |
| Displacement | 4,420 lb2,005 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 1,715 lb778 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 343 ft²31.9 m² | 405 ft²37.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.38 | 16.20 |
| Displacement / Length | 162 | 250 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.7 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.6 |
C&C 27 Mk V vs Island Packet 27: the short version
- The C&C 27 Mk V and Island Packet 27 are close in length (26.5 ft8.08 m vs 26.5 ft8.08 m ).
- The Island Packet 27 is heavier, displacing about 81% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 27 Mk V carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Island Packet 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Island Packet 27 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.