C&C 27 vs Crown 28
How do the C&C 27 and Crown 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 27 
Crown 28 | C&C 27 | Crown 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.9 ft8.49 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Waterline length | 22.9 ft6.97 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 8.8 ft2.69 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 5,500 lb2,495 kg | 6,700 lb3,039 kg |
| Ballast | 2,116 lb960 kg | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Sail area | 362 ft²33.6 m² | 372 ft²34.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.59 | 16.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 206 | 236 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.3 | 23.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.5 |
C&C 27 vs Crown 28: the short version
- The C&C 27 and Crown 28 are close in length (27.9 ft8.49 m vs 27.8 ft8.46 m ).
- The Crown 28 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 27 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Crown 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crown 28 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.