C&C 27 vs Sea Sprite 27
How do the C&C 27 and Sea Sprite 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 27 
Sea Sprite 27 | C&C 27 | Sea Sprite 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.9 ft8.49 m | 27.9 ft8.51 m |
| Waterline length | 22.9 ft6.97 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 8.8 ft2.69 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 5,500 lb2,495 kg | 7,600 lb3,447 kg |
| Ballast | 2,116 lb960 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 362 ft²33.6 m² | 341 ft²31.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.59 | 14.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 206 | 424 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.3 | 28.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.0 |
C&C 27 vs Sea Sprite 27: the short version
- The C&C 27 and Sea Sprite 27 are close in length (27.9 ft8.49 m vs 27.9 ft8.51 m ).
- The Sea Sprite 27 is heavier, displacing about 38% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 27 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 14.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sea Sprite 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sea Sprite 27 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.