C&C 30 Redwing vs C&C 35
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and C&C 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
C&C 35 | C&C 30 Redwing | C&C 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 34.6 ft10.54 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.6 ft3.22 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 576 ft²53.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 19.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 225 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 23.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.0 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs C&C 35: the short version
- The C&C 35 is the larger boat at 34.6 ft10.54 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the C&C 30 Redwing.
- The C&C 35 is heavier, displacing about 37% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 35 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.