C&C 30 Redwing vs Cygnus 20
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Cygnus 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Cygnus 20 | C&C 30 Redwing | Cygnus 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 17.5 ft5.33 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 2.8 ft0.84 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 950 lb431 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 140 lb64 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 178 ft²16.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 29.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 79 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 6.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 5.6 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Cygnus 20: the short version
- The C&C 30 Redwing is the larger boat at 30.3 ft9.22 m LOA versus 20.0 ft6.10 m for the Cygnus 20.
- The C&C 30 Redwing is heavier, displacing about 705% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cygnus 20 carries the more powerful rig (29.5 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.