C&C 30 Redwing vs Etchells
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Etchells compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Etchells | C&C 30 Redwing | Etchells | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 30.2 ft9.20 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 3,325 lb1,508 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 2,175 lb987 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 297 ft²27.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 21.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 139 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 16.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.3 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Etchells: the short version
- The C&C 30 Redwing and Etchells are close in length (30.3 ft9.22 m vs 30.2 ft9.20 m ).
- The C&C 30 Redwing is heavier, displacing about 130% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etchells carries the more powerful rig (21.3 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.