C&C 30 Redwing vs Invader 36
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Invader 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Invader 36 | C&C 30 Redwing | Invader 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 10,550 lb4,785 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 16.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 330 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 30.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.6 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Invader 36: the short version
- The Invader 36 is the larger boat at 35.8 ft10.90 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the C&C 30 Redwing.
- The Invader 36 is heavier, displacing about 38% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Invader 36 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Invader 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Invader 36 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.