C&C 30 Redwing vs Niagara 26
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Niagara 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Niagara 26 | C&C 30 Redwing | Niagara 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 26.7 ft8.13 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 316 ft²29.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 20.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 147 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Niagara 26: the short version
- The C&C 30 Redwing is the larger boat at 30.3 ft9.22 m LOA versus 26.7 ft8.13 m for the Niagara 26.
- The C&C 30 Redwing is heavier, displacing about 91% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Niagara 26 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.