C&C 30 Redwing vs Niagara 31
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Niagara 31 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Niagara 31 | C&C 30 Redwing | Niagara 31 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 31.3 ft9.53 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 3,550 lb1,610 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 492 ft²45.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 19.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 250 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 21.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.6 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Niagara 31: the short version
- The Niagara 31 is the larger boat at 31.3 ft9.53 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the C&C 30 Redwing.
- On sail area/displacement the Niagara 31 carries the more powerful rig (19.7 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.