C&C 30 Redwing vs Niagara 35
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Niagara 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Niagara 35 | C&C 30 Redwing | Niagara 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 35.1 ft10.69 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 26.7 ft8.13 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 14,000 lb6,350 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 598 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 16.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 329 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 28.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.9 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Niagara 35: the short version
- The Niagara 35 is the larger boat at 35.1 ft10.69 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the C&C 30 Redwing.
- The Niagara 35 is heavier, displacing about 83% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Niagara 35 carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Niagara 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.