C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 22
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Nonsuch 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Nonsuch 22 | C&C 30 Redwing | Nonsuch 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 306 ft²28.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 21.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 22: the short version
- The C&C 30 Redwing is the larger boat at 30.3 ft9.22 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Nonsuch 22.
- The C&C 30 Redwing is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 22 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.