C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 26
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Nonsuch 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Nonsuch 26 | C&C 30 Redwing | Nonsuch 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 24.4 ft7.44 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 2,750 lb1,247 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 420 ft²39.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 16.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 261 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 23.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.6 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 26: the short version
- The C&C 30 Redwing is the larger boat at 30.3 ft9.22 m LOA versus 26.0 ft7.92 m for the Nonsuch 26.
- The Nonsuch 26 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 30 Redwing carries the more powerful rig (16.3 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.