C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 324
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Nonsuch 324 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Nonsuch 324 | C&C 30 Redwing | Nonsuch 324 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 32.3 ft9.85 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 4,240 lb1,923 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 689 ft²64.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 21.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 216 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.2 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 324: the short version
- The Nonsuch 324 is the larger boat at 32.3 ft9.85 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the C&C 30 Redwing.
- The Nonsuch 324 is heavier, displacing about 50% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 324 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.