C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 33
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Nonsuch 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Nonsuch 33 | C&C 30 Redwing | Nonsuch 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 33.4 ft10.19 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 31.5 ft9.59 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 15,350 lb6,963 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 6,050 lb2,744 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 669 ft²62.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 17.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 220 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.5 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 33: the short version
- The Nonsuch 33 is the larger boat at 33.4 ft10.19 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the C&C 30 Redwing.
- The Nonsuch 33 is heavier, displacing about 101% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 33 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.