C&C 30 vs Leigh 30
How do the C&C 30 and Leigh 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 
Leigh 30 | C&C 30 | Leigh 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 9.8 ft2.97 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 9,100 lb4,128 kg |
| Ballast | 3,450 lb1,565 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 459 ft²42.6 m² | 420 ft²39.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.36 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 320 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.8 | 26.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.5 |
C&C 30 vs Leigh 30: the short version
- The C&C 30 and Leigh 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Leigh 30 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 30 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Leigh 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Leigh 30 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.