C&C 34/36 vs J/35
How do the C&C 34/36 and J/35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 34/36 
J/35 | C&C 34/36 | J/35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.5 ft10.82 m | 35.5 ft10.82 m |
| Waterline length | 30.8 ft9.40 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 636 ft²59.1 m² | 636 ft²59.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.41 | 21.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 174 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.0 | 19.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.3 |
C&C 34/36 vs J/35: the short version
- The C&C 34/36 and J/35 are close in length (35.5 ft10.82 m vs 35.5 ft10.82 m ).
- The C&C 34/36 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the J/35 carries the more powerful rig (21.2 vs 19.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 34/36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 34/36 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.