C&C 35 vs Cygnus 20
How do the C&C 35 and Cygnus 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 35 
Cygnus 20 | C&C 35 | Cygnus 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 17.5 ft5.33 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 2.8 ft0.84 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 950 lb431 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 140 lb64 kg |
| Sail area | 576 ft²53.5 m² | 178 ft²16.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.22 | 29.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 225 | 79 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.7 | 6.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 5.6 |
C&C 35 vs Cygnus 20: the short version
- The C&C 35 is the larger boat at 34.6 ft10.54 m LOA versus 20.0 ft6.10 m for the Cygnus 20.
- The C&C 35 is heavier, displacing about 1005% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cygnus 20 carries the more powerful rig (29.5 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 35 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.