C&C 35 vs Hinterhoeller F3
How do the C&C 35 and Hinterhoeller F3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 35 
Hinterhoeller F3 | C&C 35 | Hinterhoeller F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 36.4 ft11.08 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 10,900 lb4,944 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 5,730 lb2,599 kg |
| Sail area | 576 ft²53.5 m² | 630 ft²58.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.22 | 20.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 225 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.7 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 2.13 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.3 |
C&C 35 vs Hinterhoeller F3: the short version
- The Hinterhoeller F3 is the larger boat at 36.4 ft11.08 m LOA versus 34.6 ft10.54 m for the C&C 35.
- On sail area/displacement the Hinterhoeller F3 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 35 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.13).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.