C&C 35 vs Invader 36
How do the C&C 35 and Invader 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| C&C 35 | Invader 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 10,550 lb4,785 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Sail area | 576 ft²53.5 m² | 504 ft²46.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.22 | 16.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 225 | 330 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.7 | 30.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 1.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 6.6 |
C&C 35 vs Invader 36: the short version
- The Invader 36 is the larger boat at 35.8 ft10.90 m LOA versus 34.6 ft10.54 m for the C&C 35.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 35 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Invader 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Invader 36 rates better for offshore work (1.67 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
C&C 35