C&C 35 vs Nonsuch 324
How do the C&C 35 and Nonsuch 324 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 35 
Nonsuch 324 | C&C 35 | Nonsuch 324 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 32.3 ft9.85 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 4,240 lb1,923 kg |
| Sail area | 576 ft²53.5 m² | 689 ft²64.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.22 | 21.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 225 | 216 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.7 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.2 |
C&C 35 vs Nonsuch 324: the short version
- The C&C 35 is the larger boat at 34.6 ft10.54 m LOA versus 32.3 ft9.85 m for the Nonsuch 324.
- The Nonsuch 324 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 324 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 35 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.