C&C 35 vs Nonsuch 33
How do the C&C 35 and Nonsuch 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 35 
Nonsuch 33 | C&C 35 | Nonsuch 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 33.4 ft10.19 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 31.5 ft9.59 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 15,350 lb6,963 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 6,050 lb2,744 kg |
| Sail area | 576 ft²53.5 m² | 669 ft²62.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.22 | 17.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 225 | 220 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.7 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.5 |
C&C 35 vs Nonsuch 33: the short version
- The C&C 35 is the larger boat at 34.6 ft10.54 m LOA versus 33.4 ft10.19 m for the Nonsuch 33.
- The Nonsuch 33 is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 35 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 35 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.